Thursday, October 28, 2010
Why I am running
I have had enough of the legislature refusing to deal with the critical budget problems facing our communities. The incumbents serving in the legislature refuse to cut taxes or spending. They refuse to confront the public pension crisis. They would rather raise our taxes than cut their bonuses or per diems. The incumbents refuse to help cities and towns deal with the health care crisis crushing our towns. Their failure hurts jobs and investments, because it creates uncertainty. I support and, as a state Senator, will sponsor legislation to:
Give local officials authority to design their health insurance plans outside of collective bargaining;
Require all eligible local retirees to enroll in Medicare as their primary source of health insurance.
The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation estimates passing the first proposal will save about $100 million the first year and $2 billion annually by 2020. The second proposal, according to the same organization, would save up to $75 million annually.
I have had enough of the legislature’s chronic ethical lapses and the incumbents’ refusal to deal with the disgraceful behavior. Three house speakers have been indicted, two convicted. One state Senator was caught stuffing cash in her bra, another convicted and jailed for OUI and a third awaits trial for assaulting women in Lowell. The legislature responded by imposing more open meeting law mandates on towns, while ensuring that the requirements don’t apply to the legislature. This is the kind of hypocrisy that has destroyed confidence in state government.
If I am elected to the state Senate, I will work to end the new requirements on our local governments and make the open meeting law applicable to the legislature. I will support giving the state Auditor authority to audit the legislature and make the results of the audits public,
If you have had enough of the behavior on Beacon Hill, please vote for me on November 2. Thank you.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Lack of leadership problem with illegal immigration debate
In July, the state Senate flip flopped on the Perry Amendment, which would have required those seeking non-emergency state benefits to prove they are in the country legally. The change of heart occurred after a Globe poll was published concerning the issue. This makes it appear that much of the name calling is a political tactic rather than a sincere effort at debate. Repeated efforts by some in state government to grant in-state tuition and driver's licenses to those in the country illegally generate a legitimate controversy. We should have a rational, civil debate on these issues and stop the name calling.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
NATION’S LEADING SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION’S PAC ENDORSES ED McGRATH FOR STATE SENATE
Ed proudly accepted the endorsement. Ed said, “I am grateful for NFIB Massachusetts SAFE Trust PAC’s confidence in our campaign. NFIB gives small, independent business owners a voice. For too long, state government has over taxed and over regulated small business. Whether it is increasing the sales tax, the costs of unemployment insurance or the costs of health insurance, state government has made a tough economy tougher for small business. This has to stop, if we are going to start growing the Massachusetts economy and putting people back to work.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Soaring Health Care Costs Hurt Small Business
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Legislature must act to help towns
Cities and towns across Massachusetts are struggling to meet the crushing burden of rising health care costs and repeated cuts in local aid, but the legislature fails to help. Last week an arbitrator ruled that Framingham’s attempt to change the health benefits of new employees was a breach of contract.
I support and, as a state Senator, will sponsor legislation to:
- Give local officials authority to design their health insurance plans outside of collective bargaining;
- Require all eligible local retirees to enroll in Medicare as their primary source of health insurance.
The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation estimates passing the first proposal will save about $100 million the first year and $2 billion annually by 2020. The second proposal, according to the same organization, would save up to $75 million annually. The legislature’s failure to act has hurt cities and towns and the people of Massachusetts. If elected, I will act.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Lots of work to do
Friday, August 20, 2010
Jobs
Massachusetts has not had a consistent, fair tax policy. One year our legislature said "no" to the sales tax holiday and, in fact, in the middle of a recession, they voted to raise the sales tax. The next year -- an election year -- the legislature passed a sales tax holiday. This kind of erratic behaviour has to stop. To begin the road to recovery:
- I will support an immediate cut in the sales tax to 5%. If the voters approve a cut of the sales tax to 3% at the ballot box, I pledge to support the will of the voters and will vote to implement it;
- I will support an immediate cut in the state income tax to 5%.
There is lots to do, but cutting the sales and income tax is a critical first step.